Dispute Resolution: Is a deposit always non-refundable?

Frequently disputes occur regarding deposits and whether they are refundable if a purchase does not complete for whatever reason.

In law there is no requirement for a buyer to pay or a seller to demand a deposit. There must be a specific provision in the contract. The starting point is therefore to examine the contract. What did the parties actually agree that this payment would represent?

There are two classes into which the payment might fall. It is either:

  • A deposit; or
  • A part-payment in advance.

The distinction is particularly important when considering whether it is refundable or not if the contract is not completed for whatever reason.

What is a deposit and how does it differ from part-payment?


“a guarantee that the purchaser means business”

In the authority of Howe v Smith (1884) 27 Ch D 89, a deposit is characterised as:

  • security for the performance of the contract; and
  • part payment of the purchase price.

To be a deposit it is important that both elements are present. A mere part-payment of the purchase price is not a guarantee of the seller’s performance and is therefore treated differently from a deposit.

If a payment constitutes a deposit, then the general rule is that the deposit is non-refundable upon breach of contract. As such, if the buyer fails to perform the contract or pulls out of the purchase, the buyer has no right to the return of the deposit if the seller terminates for the buyer’s repudiatory conduct. This is because the deposit payment was made as security for performance.


In comparison, a part-payment it not a guarantee of performance. This means that if the buyer fails to perform the contract or pulls out, the buyer can claim a refund of any advance payments. That said, the buyer would be liable to the seller in damages for the breach. A seller’s right to retain any part-payment is therefore not automatic and they would need to prove its losses.

In broad summary, a deposit is a guarantee of the buyer’s performance of the contract, whereas a part-payment is exactly that: a part-payment of the price.

Is a payment a deposit or part-payment?

Whether an advance payment is a deposit, or a mere part-payment depends on what the parties intended when entering into the contact.

If a contract expressly describes the advance payment as a ‘deposit’ and is silent about whether it is refundable or not, then it will generally be classed as a deposit. The payment will therefore not be refundable.

Alternatively, if the contract does not describe the advance payment as a deposit and there are no grounds to believe that the payment is unconditional on the buyer’s performance, it will be classed as a part-payment. The payment will therefore be refundable, subject to any losses the seller may be able to claim if the buyer has cancelled in breach of the contract.

In the absence of a written contract, what was said and done then has to be examined to find out whether the parties intended that the payment would be a deposit or not.

Size of deposit

The amount of deposit is a matter for negotiation between the parties. That said, the size of the deposit must be reasonable taking into account all of the circumstances of the transaction as a whole.

If the deposit is significantly high compared to the total purchase price, then it could be held as a penalty. As a matter of public policy, penalty clauses in contracts are unenforceable. Each matter depends on the particular facts and parties are therefore advised to obtain legal advice if there is a dispute regarding a deposit payment.


In summary, a deposit is security for the buyer’s performance of the contract. It is generally not refundable unless the contract expressly states otherwise. In contrast, a part-payment is refundable, subject to any losses that the innocent party may have as a result of the breach.

Each contract needs to be considered on a case by case basis. If you are an individual or business and would like further advice on this subject, please contact the Dispute Resolution team at drteam@herrington-carmichael.com or call us on 01276 686222.

This reflects the law at the date of publication and is written as a general guide. It does not contain definitive legal advice, which should be sought as appropriate in relation to a particular matter.

Our Emailers will bring you the latest news and insights from our legal teams as we look at the key talking points in life and in law.

Our insights will include articles, podcast discussion and information about our events and services.

You can sign up to as many as you wish and you can opt out at any time.

Top Legal Insights

Material Breach of Contract

What is a ‘material’ breach of contract by a party to a commercial contract? This is a critical issue regularly considered by the courts. What constitutes a material breach and what are the remedies?

Commercial Lease: The Financial impact on Landlord and Tenant

Coronavirus (COVID-19) and the restrictions now in place to control its spread, are having a significant effect on many business sectors.

Divorce in Lockdown: Can I get some discreet legal advice?

We have spoken to clients who are unfortunately experiencing some family issues, and would like to obtain expert legal advice, yet don’t know how…

Land & Property Dispute

Restrictive Covenants – The Price of Modification

Having identified that your land is burdened by a restrictive covenant and for the purposes of this article the covenant in question will be that only one residential building can be erected on the land. What do you do next?

Wills, Trusts and Probate

Why is having a will so important?

It is entirely up to you if and when you want to create a Will, but it is important to be aware of the consequences of not having a Will.

Award winning legal advice

We are solicitors in Camberley, Wokingham and London. In 2019, Herrington Carmichael won ‘Property Law Firm of the Year’ at the Thames Valley Business Magazines Property Awards, ‘Best Medium Sized Business’ at the Surrey Heath Business Awards and we were named IR Global’s ‘Member of the Year’. We are ranked as a Leading Firm 2022 by Legal 500 and Alistair McArthur is ranked in Chambers 2021.


60 St Martins Lane, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4JS

+44 (0) 203 755 0557


Building 2  Watchmoor Park, Riverside Way, Camberley, Surrey  GU15 3YL

+44 (0)1276 686 222

Wokingham (Appointment only)

4 The Courtyard, Denmark Street, Wokingham, Berkshire RG40 2AZ

+44 (0)118 977 4045


© 2020 Herrington Carmichael LLP. Registered in England and Wales company number OC322293.

Herrington Carmichael LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

Privacy   |   Legal Notices, T&Cs, Complaints Resolution   |   Cookies   |   Client Feedback


Stephen Baker
Partner, Head of Dispute Resolution
View profileContact Us

This reflects the law and market position at the date of publication and is written as a general guide. It does not contain definitive legal advice, which should be sought in relation to a specific matter.

Latest Legal Insights

Best Law Firms 2024

Herrington Carmichael has once again been named in the Times Best Law Firms. We were first listed in 2023 and have once again made the Best Law Firms list for 2024.  


Best Law Firm 2024