Divorce: Compensation for a career cut short?

Mar 31, 2020

A mother was recently awarded £400,000.00 on top of her equal share of the matrimonial assets to ‘compensate’ her for giving up her career to look after her children. Both the parties were solicitors and the mother had given up her role to take on primary responsibility for the care of the children, whilst the father had gone on to have a ‘stellar’ career.  The total assets in this case were around £10 million.

Justice Moor referred to the mother’s position as a ‘relationship-generated disadvantage’. This term has been used in previous cases to describe a situation where one party had been denied the opportunity to maximise their earning capacity as a result of giving up a career to support their family in other ways.

For many people who are divorcing, and frequently  wives who gave up professional careers to take care of the family, the idea that they should be compensated for this seems intuitively fair. For others, the idea that giving up a career to take care of one’s own home and children is a ‘sacrifice’ that requires compensation is unsavoury.

It is also important to note that matrimonial law has long recognised that working spouses and homemakers can make equal contributions to a marriage, and this is reflected in the principle that ‘equal sharing’ of capital is the starting point when determining finances on divorce.

Q: So why would the court order that a home-maker spouse should receive an additional amount in ‘compensation’?

A: Even if a non-working spouse received half of the total capital that was accrued during the marriage, their higher-earning and more experienced spouse is likely to be able to build up even more wealth post-divorce, whilst they will never have the same opportunity to do this and will always need live within the same parameters.

The ‘compensation’ argument is usually successful only in a very limited set of circumstances.

Generally, compensation arguments will succeed where there is an almost near certainty that one party had given up a very high-earning career, which, if they had pursued it, would have given them an income that was at least as high as their spouse.

It is important to remember that even if the ‘compensation’ argument cannot be applied to your case, the court is nevertheless obliged under Section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1967 (the key piece of legislation which covers finances on divorce) to consider each parties earning capacity both now and in the future when deciding on an order to make.

This means that the court will consider the impact of giving up a career to look after the children on a party’s ability to earn, and will order spousal maintenance to ‘bridge the gap’ where appropriate.

Our team of family solicitors are experts in the field of matrimonial finances on divorce. If you would like to speak to one of team, please do not hesitate to contact our family team on 0118 977 4045.  We are happy to speak to you over the phone or via video call (using FaceTime or WhatsApp).

This reflects the law and market position at the date of publication and is written as a general guide. It does not contain definitive legal advice, which should be sought in relation to a specific matter.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Articles & Legal Insights

Sign up

Enter your email address for legal updates on Private Client & Family Law.

Please see our privacy policy regarding use of your data.


Top read insights in 2019

Contract Law

Material Breach of Contract

What is a ‘material’ breach of contract by a party to a commercial contract? This is a critical issue regularly considered by the courts. What constitutes a material breach and what are the remedies?

Property Law

Purchasing Land – Option Agreements

A developer and a landowner can enter into an Option Agreement. What are the strategies that can be employed by both landowners and developers to assist in such land deals?

Divorce and Family Law

What are the Tax Implications of a Civil Partnership?

Is there a significant tax saving to be made by a couple who are married or in a civil partnership that cohabitating couples simply don’t qualify for?  

Land & Property Dispute

Restrictive Covenants – The Price of Modification

Having identified that your land is burdened by a restrictive covenant and for the purposes of this article the covenant in question will be that only one residential building can be erected on the land. What do you do next?

Wills, Trusts and Probate

Is my Will applicable to my Spanish property?

You must be careful when relying on an English Will in relation to your Spanish property.

Award winning legal advice

We are solicitors in Camberley, Wokingham and London. In 2019, Herrington Carmichael won ‘Property Law Firm of the Year’ at the Thames Valley Business Magazines Property Awards, ‘Best Medium Sized Business’ at the Surrey Heath Business Awards and we were named IR Global’s ‘Member of the Year’. We are ranked as a Leading Firm 2020 by Legal 500 and Alistair McArthur is ranked in Chambers 2020.

Awards | Accreditations 

Accredited Conveyancing Lawyers
Accredited Immigration & Asylum Lawyers
Accredited Conveyancing Lawyers
Accredited Immigration & Asylum Lawyers
London

60 St Martins Lane, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4JS 

+44 (0) 203 755 0557

Camberley

Building 9, Riverside Way, Watchmoor Park, Camberley, Surrey. GU15 3YL. 

+44 (0)1276 686 222

Wokingham

Opening Soon

+44 (0)118 977 4045

info@herrington-carmichael.com

© 2020 Herrington Carmichael LLP. Registered in England and Wales company number OC322293.

Herrington Carmichael LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

Privacy   |   Terms and Conditions   |   Cookies   |   Client Feedback