Removal of Unnecessary Information – will Companies House Amend the Register?
The Companies Act 2006 (‘CA 2006’) provides a mechanism for the correction or removal of documents filed with Companies House which contain ‘unnecessary material’. This would include, for example, company accounts or documents containing sensitive, incorrect or confidential information which goes beyond the statutory filing requirements.
Although a process exists for the correction or removal of ‘unnecessary material’, in reality the removal of such material is not always easy to achieve. The powers that the Registrar has to remove material from the register contain very little elements of discretion, and it is often the case that a cautious approach is taken whereby material will not be removed without a court order.
It is however, in specific circumstances, possible to get information removed without court proceedings being needed. We have on several occasions assisted Companies and their advisers in getting information removed from a filing where additional pages, not required by statute, were included with the statutory information filed.
The main occurrences have been in connection with the filing of accounts where profit and loss information meant for directors and shareholders was uploaded with the rest of the accounts.
The Process
The Registrar of Companies has certain statutory powers to reject, amend and remove information submitted for public filing. A company wishing to have ‘unnecessary material’ removed or amended is therefore able to make an application following the correct procedure to Companies House.
Section 1074 of the CA 2006 provides that, where a document delivered to Companies House contains ‘unnecessary material’, the document must be rejected. This is unless the ‘unnecessary material’ can be ‘readily separated’ from the rest of the documents submitted, for example, if the irrelevant information is included on a separate sheet or document, or a few pages at the end of the document. If the ‘unnecessary material’ can be readily separated, the Registrar will have discretion as to whether to register the document with or without the relevant information.
Section 1094 of the CA 2006 then provides that anything on the register which Companies House had the power, but not the duty, to register can be removed by the Registrar, subject to some exceptions. However, as outlined above, getting information removed or amended is not an easy process, and although a court order is not always required, Companies House may be unlikely to edit the register without one (as was the case Re Peter Jones (China) Ltd [2021] EWHC 215 (Ch)) whereby certain pages containing additional information was uploaded as part of a statement of affairs by the administrator.
Correcting Information
The best course of action is always to thoroughly review any documents being filed with Companies House before they are submitted to ensure the information contained is correct, and nothing constituting ‘unnecessary material’ is included. This can be particularly important where the business does not want any confidential or sensitive information entering the hands of competitors, like profit and loss information.
As explained above, once a document has been filed with Companies House, it can be difficult to remove or rectify. If you require assistance with any company filing requirements, or help in getting unnecessary information removed from the public register, please contact our corporate governance team who will be happy to assist by contacting – michelle.lamberth@herrington-carmichael.com or ask for Michelle Lamberth on 0118 977 4045.
This reflects the law and market position at the date of publication and is written as a general guide. It does not contain definitive legal advice, which should be sought in relation to a specific matter.
FREE: Legal Insights and Event News
Keep you, your family and / or business up to date on how the law affects you, by subscribing to one of our legal insights.

Subscribe for free Legal Insights
& Event updates
Latest News & Insights
Commercial Contracts – why can’t I recover all my loss?
The basic position is that if Party A fails to comply with its obligations under a contract with...
The Incoterms® Rules – what are they and how do they work?
The Incoterms® Rules (‘Incoterms’) are a standardised set of international contractual terms...
Business rates on the high street – what the Budget means for you
On 3 March 2021, the Chancellor announced key steps the country will take on the road to recovery...
The Trade and Cooperation Agreement: Is it all just smoke and mirrors?
With the Brexit transition period having expired over 2 months ago and a UK-EU Trade Agreement...
Herrington Carmichael assists in the formation of new fitness group
Herrington Carmichael LLP assisted Boom Cycle, the UK’s first boutique cycling business, in its...
Investment and restructure of Wessex Woodland Management Ltd
Wessex Woodland Management, a bespoke woodland management services provider, recently instructed...
Top Legal Insights
Contract Law
Material Breach of Contract
What is a ‘material’ breach of contract by a party to a commercial contract? This is a critical issue regularly considered by the courts. What constitutes a material breach and what are the remedies?
Property Law
Commercial Lease: The Financial impact on Landlord and Tenant
Coronavirus (COVID-19) and the restrictions now in place to control its spread, are having a significant effect on many business sectors.
Divorce and Family Law
Divorce in Lockdown: Can I get some discreet legal advice?
We have spoken to clients who are unfortunately experiencing some family issues, and would like to obtain expert legal advice, yet don’t know how...
Land & Property Dispute
Restrictive Covenants – The Price of Modification
Having identified that your land is burdened by a restrictive covenant and for the purposes of this article the covenant in question will be that only one residential building can be erected on the land. What do you do next?
Award winning legal advice
We are solicitors in Camberley, Wokingham and London. In 2019, Herrington Carmichael won ‘Property Law Firm of the Year’ at the Thames Valley Business Magazines Property Awards, ‘Best Medium Sized Business’ at the Surrey Heath Business Awards and we were named IR Global’s ‘Member of the Year’. We are ranked as a Leading Firm 2020 by Legal 500 and Alistair McArthur is ranked in Chambers 2020.









London
60 St Martins Lane, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4JS
Camberley
Building 2 Watchmoor Park, Riverside Way, Camberley, Surrey GU15 3YL
Wokingham (Appointment only)
4 The Courtyard, Denmark Street, Wokingham, Berkshire RG40 2AZ
info@herrington-carmichael.com
© 2020 Herrington Carmichael LLP. Registered in England and Wales company number OC322293.
Herrington Carmichael LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
Privacy | Legal Notices, T&Cs, Complaints Resolution | Cookies | Client Feedback