Vaccination issues for employers
Whilst the vaccine is currently only being rolled out to priority groups, its anticipated that it will be available to the wider population in the not too distant future.
Employers hoping for a return to the workplace will need to consider how to comply with their health and safety obligations and whether vaccinations could play a part in this.
Earlier this month, it was reported that Pimlico Plumbers would be introducing a “no jab, no job” policy, requiring all of their workers to be vaccinated against Covid-19. However, a blanket approach to employee vaccination like this could bring with it a number of legal issues. Employers will need to take care in addressing the topic of employee vaccinations to avoid any discrimination or other employment law issues.
Can employers require employees to be vaccinated?
Asking employees to receive the vaccine could be regarded as a ‘reasonable management instruction’. However, this will depend on the circumstances of each employee. Whilst a request to be vaccinated may be considered ‘reasonable’ for those working in the health and social care sector, such a request may not meet the legal threshold in other sectors, where the rationale for staff to be vaccinated may not be as strong.
Whether such a request would be a ‘reasonable instruction’ should be assessed on a case by case basis and we would recommend taking professional advice on such an issue. A failure to follow a reasonable instruction could justify disciplinary action being taken by an employee, however employers should be encouraged to tread very carefully if considering any form of disciplinary action or dismissal arising from a refusal to receive a vaccine.
Employers will need to ensure that any policy on vaccination does not adversely affect people from a protected group (i.e because of their race, age, sex, religion or disability). Any different treatment between those who have and haven’t been vaccinated could also amount to indirect discrimination. This could especially be the case during the current stages of the vaccination stages, where older and clinically vulnerable people are being prioritised for the vaccine.
A sensible approach to take would be to encourage employees to be vaccinated as and when they have the option and highlighting the benefits to them and their colleagues of doing so. Any health and safety precautions already being taken should not be scaled back following employee vaccinations and employers should continue to follow the government’s industry specific Covid-Secure workplace guidance.
This is a topic that is likely to develop substantially over the coming months and it is likely we will see further guidance and advice from the government and the Health and Safety Executive. At this stage, however, employers should be aware of the potential issues related to employee vaccinations and should consider communicating with employees to try and resolve any concerns as early as possible.
For further information, or to discuss the issues raised by this update, please contact our Employment Group on 0118 977 4045 or employment@herrington-carmichael.com.
This reflects the law at the date of publication and is written as a general guide. It does not contain definitive legal advice, which should be sought as appropriate in relation to a particular matter.
FREE: Legal Insights and Event News
Keep you, your family and / or business up to date on how the law affects you, by subscribing to one of our legal insights.

Subscribe for free Legal Insights
& Event updates
Latest Articles
Uber loses in the Supreme Court: drivers are workers, not self-employed
On 19 February 2020 the Supreme Court upheld the Employment Tribunal’s decision in the Uber BV v Aslam & Others case.
Would you rather: pay £62,381 in compensation OR make “reasonable adjustments”?
On 4 January 2021, an employer was ordered to pay £62,381 to a Claimant, for failing to make “reasonable adjustments”.
Has your equality and diversity training gone “stale”?
Employers need to take “reasonable steps” to prevent discrimination in the workplace and this includes regular equality and diversity training.
Top Legal Insights
Contract Law
Material Breach of Contract
What is a ‘material’ breach of contract by a party to a commercial contract? This is a critical issue regularly considered by the courts. What constitutes a material breach and what are the remedies?
Property Law
Commercial Lease: The Financial impact on Landlord and Tenant
Coronavirus (COVID-19) and the restrictions now in place to control its spread, are having a significant effect on many business sectors.
Divorce and Family Law
Divorce in Lockdown: Can I get some discreet legal advice?
We have spoken to clients who are unfortunately experiencing some family issues, and would like to obtain expert legal advice, yet don’t know how...
Land & Property Dispute
Restrictive Covenants – The Price of Modification
Having identified that your land is burdened by a restrictive covenant and for the purposes of this article the covenant in question will be that only one residential building can be erected on the land. What do you do next?
Award winning legal advice
We are solicitors in Camberley, Wokingham and London. In 2019, Herrington Carmichael won ‘Property Law Firm of the Year’ at the Thames Valley Business Magazines Property Awards, ‘Best Medium Sized Business’ at the Surrey Heath Business Awards and we were named IR Global’s ‘Member of the Year’. We are ranked as a Leading Firm 2020 by Legal 500 and Alistair McArthur is ranked in Chambers 2020.









London
60 St Martins Lane, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4JS
Camberley
Building 2 Watchmoor Park, Riverside Way, Camberley, Surrey GU15 3YL
Wokingham (Appointment only)
4 The Courtyard, Denmark Street, Wokingham, Berkshire RG40 2AZ
info@herrington-carmichael.com
© 2020 Herrington Carmichael LLP. Registered in England and Wales company number OC322293.
Herrington Carmichael LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
Privacy | Legal Notices, T&Cs, Complaints Resolution | Cookies | Client Feedback