Shared Parental Leave Sex Discrimination Claim
Can a man on Shared Parental Leave use a woman on Adoption Leave as a comparator in a sex discrimination claim? The recent Employment Appeal Tribunal decision in Price v Powys County Council says not.
The Decision in Price v Powys County Council
The Claimant in this case, a man, took Shared Parental Leave (SPL) as soon as his wife’s compulsory maternity leave had ended. It was the Council’s policy that he would receive pay equal to statutory maternity pay, whereas the Council’s policy for those on Adoption Leave was to provide full pay.
The Claimant sought to use the fact that he was being paid less than a female comparator on Adoption Leave as the basis of a sex discrimination claim. One of the submissions the Claimant sought to argue was that the predominant purpose of both SPL and Adoption Leave is childcare and as such, Adoption Leave is directly comparable to SPL, and a male taking SPL should not be treated differently to a female taking Adoption Leave.
The Tribunal dismissed the claim on the basis that the female comparator on Adoption Leave was materially different from the Claimant for reasons such as Adoption Leave could begin before placement, whereas SPL could not and Adoption Leave was an immediate entitlement on placement, whereas SPL was not. The Claimant appealed this decision.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal dismissed the appeal and agreed that Adoption Leave is materially different to SPL as its purposes go beyond providing childcare alone. One of the differences the Employment Appeal Tribunal noted was that considerations to a child’s welfare in the case of adoption include matters such as the forming of a parental bond, becoming a family, and the taking of steps to prepare and maintain an appropriate and safe environment for the adopted child.
The case demonstrates that there is a material difference between Shared Parental Leave and Adoption Leave and therefore it is not possible to use someone on one of these types of leave as a comparator to the other in a sex discrimination claim. The Equality Act 2010 provides that there must be no material difference in circumstances between a Claimant and a comparator – the Employment Appeal Tribunal here confirmed that there are differences between the two types of leave that are ‘clearly material’ within the meaning of the Equality Act.
Click here to see our ‘Employment Law Figures 2021’ which includes basic figures, time off work, living wage, minimum wage and tax rates.
This reflects the law at the date of publication and is written as a general guide. It does not contain definitive legal advice, which should be sought as appropriate in relation to a particular matter.
FREE: Legal Insights and Event News
Keep you, your family and / or business up to date on how the law affects you, by subscribing to one of our legal insights.
Subscribe for free Legal Insights
& Event updates
Latest News & Insights
On 19 February 2021 the Supreme Court upheld the Employment Tribunal’s decision in the Uber BV v...
On 4 January 2021, an employer was ordered to pay to a Claimant £31,500 plus interest for injury...
In January 2019 the Employment Tribunal held that Mr Gehlen (the Claimant) suffered race related...
On 13 January 2021, the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal from Travel Counsellors Limited (TCL)...
Whilst the vaccine is currently only being rolled out to priority groups, its anticipated that it...
We are pleased to provide you with the Herrington Carmichael employment law update for January...
Top Legal Insights
Award winning legal advice
We are solicitors in Camberley, Wokingham and London. In 2019, Herrington Carmichael won ‘Property Law Firm of the Year’ at the Thames Valley Business Magazines Property Awards, ‘Best Medium Sized Business’ at the Surrey Heath Business Awards and we were named IR Global’s ‘Member of the Year’. We are ranked as a Leading Firm 2020 by Legal 500 and Alistair McArthur is ranked in Chambers 2020.