fbpx

Tribunal Awards Record Disability Discrimination Award

Mei 26, 2021

In the case of Barrow v Kellogg Brown and Root (UK) Ltd, the Employment Tribunal has awarded £2.5million in a record discrimination award, the second largest disability discrimination award ever made by the Employment Tribunal.

Barrow v Kellogg Brown and Root (UK) Ltd

The Employment Tribunal has awarded a record £2,567,831.97 following a finding against an employer for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination.

In this case, Mr Barrow brought claims of unfair dismissal, disability discrimination, harassment, victimisation and failure to make reasonable adjustments against his employer of some 36 years.

In november 2017, Mr Barrow sent some ‘defensive’ emails to his manager following which he was excluded from his workplace. At the time, Mr Barrow was suffering some side effects from steroids he had been prescribed to combat his experience of symptoms of cancer (undiagnosed at the time) which began to alter Mr Barrow’s mental health and behaviour.

In december 2017, Mr Barrow was called to a meeting and was dismissed. No reason was given; Mr Barrow was simply told by his line manager that ‘Kellogg Brown can no longer employ you’. Kellogg Brown wrote to its staff members the next day and informed them that Mr Barrow had been let go for poor performance.

In januari 2018, Mr Barrow was formally diagnosed with a rare cancer, of which he informed Kellogg Brown. Following this, and in an attempt to show that they had followed a fair procedure, Kellogg Brown instigated a post-dated dismissal process with Mr Barrow, which concluded with Mr Barrow being formally dismissed in Mei 2018. The reason given for Mr Barrow’s dismissal was a breakdown in the implied term of trust and confidence. As a result of this, Mr Barrow brought the above listed claims against his employer.

The Employment Tribunal

The Tribunal looked at the ‘december dismissal’ and found that Kellogg Brown had provided little or no evidence in the dismissal letter for the breakdown in trust and confidence, and Kellogg Brown had failed to prove to the Tribunal that this breakdown was the reason for the dismissal.

The Tribunal called the ‘Mei dismissal’, a ‘sham’ and considered that the process was carried out to ‘give the impression that the process of dismissal was fair’. The Tribunal considered that, in reality, Mr Barrow’s line manager had predetermined that Mr Barrow was going to leave and subsequently attempted to use a breakdown in trust and confidence as the reason for Mr Barrow leaving. This predetermined decision was delivered by an alternative member of the Senior Leadership Team in a further attempt that the decision appeared legitimate.

Mr Barrow’s claims for discrimination, disability discrimination, harassment, victimisation and failure to make reasonable adjustments were successful. The Tribunal concluded that ‘no reasonable employer would have acted in [this] way, dismissing an employee who had spent 36 years working for the company’.

Of note was that Mr Barrow’s claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments was successful, despite Kellogg Brown not being aware of his cancer diagnosis at the december dismissal; however, they were aware of the effect of his steroid medication on his mental health and they did not use the Mei dismissal process to adjust their perception of some of Mr Barrow’s conduct accordingly.

Summary

Mr Barrow was awarded a “career-long loss” award, due to his length of service at Kellogg Brown and his age and also as his cancer meant that he was unlikely to work again. Mr Barrow was also awarded aggravated damages due to the way Mr Barrow had been treated by Kellogg Brown, knowing full well that he was disabled. The Tribunal also awarded £25,000 for pain, suffering and loss of amenity.

This case demonstrates that discrimination awards are not subject to a cap, unlike unfair dismissal claims, and that even though the average award is much lower, discrimination claims can lead to huge awards. The case also highlights the importance of employers following a fair dismissal process and not predetermining the outcome. Decision makers should have the freedom to come to their own conclusions and should not be used as ‘puppets’ to deliver a predetermined outcome.

For further information or to discuss the issues raised by this update, please contact our Employment Group on 0118 977 4045 or employment@herrington-carmichael.com.

Click here to see our ‘Employment Law Figures 2021’ which includes basic figures, time off work, living wage, minimum wage and tax rates.

 

Dit weerspiegelt de wet op de datum van publicatie en is geschreven als een algemene leidraad. Het bevat geen definitief juridisch advies, dat in voorkomend geval met betrekking tot een bepaalde zaak moet worden ingewonnen.

Jessica Chard

Jessica Chard

Trainee Solicitor, Employment Law

Aanmelden

Voer uw e-mailadres in voor juridische updates over Arbeids- en Immigratierecht.

Zie onze privacybeleid met betrekking tot het gebruik van uw gegevens.


Contacteer ons

    De door u verstrekte informatie wordt behandeld in overeenstemming met ons privacybeleid.

    GRATIS: Juridisch inzicht en evenementennieuws 

    Keep you, your family and / or business up to date on how the law affects you, by subscribing to one of our legal insights.

    Subscribe for free Legal Insights
    & Event updates

    Receive the latest legal developments and professional advice to keep your family and business safe.
    Please choose which list you would like to subscribe to below.





    Zie onze privacyverklaring met betrekking tot het gebruik van uw gegevens.


    Latest News & Insights

    Top Juridische Inzichten

     

    Contractenrecht

    Materiële contractbreuk

    Wat is een 'wezenlijke' contractbreuk door een partij bij een commercieel contract? Dit is een kritische kwestie die regelmatig door de rechter wordt overwogen. Wat is een wezenlijke inbreuk en wat zijn de rechtsmiddelen?

    Eigendomsrecht

    Commerciële lease: De financiële gevolgen voor de verhuurder en de huurder

    Het Coronavirus (COVID-19) en de beperkingen die nu gelden om de verspreiding ervan onder controle te houden, hebben een aanzienlijk effect op veel bedrijfssectoren.

    Echtscheiding en familierecht

    Echtscheiding in Lockdown: Kan ik discreet juridisch advies krijgen?

    We hebben met cliënten gesproken die helaas wat familiekwesties ondervinden, en die graag deskundig juridisch advies willen inwinnen, maar niet weten hoe...

    Geschil over grond en onroerend goed

    Beperkende Convenanten - De prijs van de wijziging

    Als u vaststelt dat uw grond belast is met een restrictief convenant en voor de toepassing van dit artikel zal het betreffende convenant inhouden dat er slechts één woongebouw op de grond kan worden opgericht. Wat doet u vervolgens?

    Testamenten, trusts en probaten

    Waarom is het hebben van een testament zo belangrijk?

    Het is geheel aan u of en wanneer u een testament wilt maken, maar het is belangrijk om u bewust te zijn van de gevolgen van het niet hebben van een testament.

    Bekroond juridisch advies

    We zijn advocaten in Camberley, Wokingham en Londen. In 2019 won Herrington Carmichael 'Property Law Firm of the Year' bij de Thames Valley Business Magazines Property Awards, 'Best Medium Sized Business' bij de Surrey Heath Business Awards en werden we uitgeroepen tot IR Global's 'Member of the Year'. We zijn gerangschikt als Leading Firm 2020 door Legal 500 en Alistair McArthur is gerangschikt in Chambers 2020.

    ongedefinieerde
    ongedefinieerde

    Londen

    60 St Martins Lane, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4JS 

    +44 (0) 203 755 0557

     

    Camberley

    Building 2  Watchmoor Park, Riverside Way, Camberley, Surrey  GU15 3YL

    +44 (0)1276 686 222

     

    Wokingham (Appointment only)

    4 The Courtyard, Denmark Street, Wokingham, Berkshire RG40 2AZ

    +44 (0)118 977 4045

    info@herrington-carmichael.com

    © 2020 Herrington Carmichael LLP. Geregistreerd in Engeland en Wales bedrijfsnummer OC322293.

    Herrington Carmichael LLP is gemachtigd en gereguleerd door de Solicitors Regulation Authority.

    Privacy   |   Legal Notices, T&Cs, Complaints Resolution   |   Cookies   |   Client Feedback