fbpx

Landmark Decision for Asda Workers

Mar 30, 2021

In a landmark Supreme Court decision, retail employees of Asda which include shop floor workers and other front of house staff are now one step closer to succeeding in their claim for equal pay. In this ongoing lengthy dispute between Asda and its retail employees, the Supreme Court has now confirmed that those employees can be compared with employees who work in the distribution centre for the purpose of an equal pay claim.

The Claimants in this case have overcome a large hurdle but the legal battle is not over. It is now for the retail employees to prove that retail work and distribution work are of “equal value.” Asda states the retail roles are very different and distinct compared with the distribution centre.

Case Summary

The original Employment Tribunal decision on this case dated back to 2016. Asda employs over 133,000 employees across the UK. All staff who are based in-store are employed on similar terms although their pay rates differ depending on their geographical area. Asda also operate distribution centres where employees are engaged on different terms and attract a higher salary. None of the retail sites and distribution sites are connected.

In this ongoing claim, a large group of predominantly female retail workers asserted they should be paid equal to that of the higher paid, predominately male workers in the distribution centres as their roles are comparable. Asda argued that they were employed on different terms and conditions undertaking different distinct work and therefore the two cannot be compared.

The Supreme Court has issued a judgment that because there are no actual comparators in this case, the Tribunal must consider whether hypothetical comparators would have been employed on similar terms if they were employed in the same establishment as the Claimants. In this case, it was decided that the distribution workers would have been employed on largely the same terms as the retail workers if they were based at the same site.

As a result, Asda retail workers can now compare themselves to distribution workers to decide whether they should receive equal pay. The next chapter of this dispute will require the Claimants to show that they are undertaking work of a similar value and for the Tribunal to determine whether there are reasons why employees in the store are being paid less than those in distribution centres, other than gender.

Summary

Whilst this claim is good news for the Claimants, they have only passed a hurdle and are not over the finish line yet. This is one stage of a very complex case and it is likely to be a number of years until this will be finalised. Further to this judgment, Asda has released a statement confirming they will continue to defend these claims as they consider “retail and distribution are very different sectors with their own distinct skill sets.”

It is important for employers to know about the decision as it is likely to have a huge impact on all supermarkets and other retail outlets who operate a similar model and there are similar ongoing equal pay cases against other retailers including Sainsbury’s and Tesco. Other businesses should also be taking this as an opportunity to review pay across their business. It will be interesting to see how the case develops over the coming years.

Click here to see our ‘Employment Law Figures 2021’ which includes basic figures, time off work, living wage, minimum wage and tax rates.

For further information or to discuss the issues raised by this update, please contact our Employment Group on 0118 977 4045 or employment@herrington-carmichael.com.

 

Dit weerspiegelt de wet op de datum van publicatie en is geschreven als een algemene leidraad. Het bevat geen definitief juridisch advies, dat in voorkomend geval met betrekking tot een bepaalde zaak moet worden ingewonnen.

Chantelle DeFilippis

Chantelle DeFilippis

Advocaat, Arbeidsrecht

Aanmelden

Voer uw e-mailadres in voor juridische updates over Arbeids- en Immigratierecht.

Zie onze privacybeleid met betrekking tot het gebruik van uw gegevens.


Contacteer ons

    De door u verstrekte informatie wordt behandeld in overeenstemming met ons privacybeleid.

    GRATIS: Juridisch inzicht en evenementennieuws 

    Keep you, your family and / or business up to date on how the law affects you, by subscribing to one of our legal insights.

    Subscribe for free Legal Insights
    & Event updates

    Receive the latest legal developments and professional advice to keep your family and business safe.
    Please choose which list you would like to subscribe to below.





    Zie onze privacyverklaring met betrekking tot het gebruik van uw gegevens.


    Latest News & Insights

    Top Juridische Inzichten

     

    Contractenrecht

    Materiële contractbreuk

    Wat is een 'wezenlijke' contractbreuk door een partij bij een commercieel contract? Dit is een kritische kwestie die regelmatig door de rechter wordt overwogen. Wat is een wezenlijke inbreuk en wat zijn de rechtsmiddelen?

    Eigendomsrecht

    Commerciële lease: De financiële gevolgen voor de verhuurder en de huurder

    Het Coronavirus (COVID-19) en de beperkingen die nu gelden om de verspreiding ervan onder controle te houden, hebben een aanzienlijk effect op veel bedrijfssectoren.

    Echtscheiding en familierecht

    Echtscheiding in Lockdown: Kan ik discreet juridisch advies krijgen?

    We hebben met cliënten gesproken die helaas wat familiekwesties ondervinden, en die graag deskundig juridisch advies willen inwinnen, maar niet weten hoe...

    Geschil over grond en onroerend goed

    Beperkende Convenanten - De prijs van de wijziging

    Als u vaststelt dat uw grond belast is met een restrictief convenant en voor de toepassing van dit artikel zal het betreffende convenant inhouden dat er slechts één woongebouw op de grond kan worden opgericht. Wat doet u vervolgens?

    Testamenten, trusts en probaten

    Waarom is het hebben van een testament zo belangrijk?

    Het is geheel aan u of en wanneer u een testament wilt maken, maar het is belangrijk om u bewust te zijn van de gevolgen van het niet hebben van een testament.

    Bekroond juridisch advies

    We zijn advocaten in Camberley, Wokingham en Londen. In 2019 won Herrington Carmichael 'Property Law Firm of the Year' bij de Thames Valley Business Magazines Property Awards, 'Best Medium Sized Business' bij de Surrey Heath Business Awards en werden we uitgeroepen tot IR Global's 'Member of the Year'. We zijn gerangschikt als Leading Firm 2020 door Legal 500 en Alistair McArthur is gerangschikt in Chambers 2020.

    ongedefinieerde
    ongedefinieerde

    Londen

    60 St Martins Lane, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4JS 

    +44 (0) 203 755 0557

     

    Camberley

    Building 2  Watchmoor Park, Riverside Way, Camberley, Surrey  GU15 3YL

    +44 (0)1276 686 222

     

    Wokingham (Appointment only)

    4 The Courtyard, Denmark Street, Wokingham, Berkshire RG40 2AZ

    +44 (0)118 977 4045

    info@herrington-carmichael.com

    © 2020 Herrington Carmichael LLP. Geregistreerd in Engeland en Wales bedrijfsnummer OC322293.

    Herrington Carmichael LLP is gemachtigd en gereguleerd door de Solicitors Regulation Authority.

    Privacy   |   Legal Notices, T&Cs, Complaints Resolution   |   Cookies   |   Client Feedback