Lay Offs and Short-Time Working
We have recently received a number of queries from employers regarding laying off their workforce or placing them on short-time working to assist in their financial recover. Below we have provided some generic advice for employers which may be used to aid recovery, especially when the provisions of the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme no longer apply.
What is lay-off and short-time working?
When you lay off an employee, you essentially stop providing them with work and pay for a period of time. They still remain your employee, but will not be required to work.
In contrast, short-time working is where you provide an employee with less work and less pay for a period of time. Again, they still remain your employee, but are required to work less than their standard hours.
Both of these should only be used on a temporary basis to provide reduced costs for short-term recovery. There are two different ways that an employer can try to implement lay-offs or short-time working, and this depends on the contract of employment.
How does it work?
Some contracts of employment will have a clause allowing short-time working or lay-off of the employee. This would give the employer a contractual right to lay-off or place the employee onto short-time working.
It is also possible for lay-off or short-time working to be implied into employment contracts. This can only happen where the employer operates within an industry where lay-offs and short-time working is common practice. In order for this to apply, the common practice must be ‘reasonable, certain and notorious’ and such that ‘no workman could be supposed to have entered into service without looking to it as part of the contract’.
What if there is no term in the contract allowing lay-off or short-time working?
In this situation, an employer would be in fundamental breach of contract if they lay-off or place an employee on short-time working. This would entitle the employee to either resign and claim they were constructively dismissed, or accept the breach of contract and claim a statutory guarantee payment.
Where an employer is experiencing a need to temporarily reduce its costs, it should consult with employees to try and agree a temporary reduction in pay and benefits. Employees being consulted with may be more willing than normal to accept these terms if the alternative is closure of business or job losses. Ultimately, if an agreement cannot be reached, the employer will need to consider a redundancy process.
How much notice or consultation should be given?
If there is a clause in the employment contract allowing for lay-offs or short-time working, this may also expressly outline a certain notice or consultation period that the employer will need to adhere to avoid being in breach of the contract.
If you have a contractual clause that is silent on a notice or consultation period, or no clause at all, the notice requirements will depend on what could be considered reasonable in the circumstances. Employers should be careful here to carefully balance the needs of the business against the need to act reasonably in how employees are managed. If there was a pressing need to implement lay-offs immediately, this should be clearly communicated to employees.
What payments will the employee be entitled to?
Subject to statutory eligibility criteria, an employee that has been laid-off or placed on short-time working will be entitled to a Statutory Guarantee Payment. At the time of writing, this is set at £29 a day for up to 5 days in any 3 month period (giving a maximum of £145). If the employee works part-time or earns less than £29 a day, this amount will be reduced proportionally.
An employee that has been laid off or placed on short-time working may also be entitled to claim a statutory redundancy payment in certain circumstances. To do this, they will have to follow the relevant scheme set out in the Employment Rights Act 1996.
If you are considering laying-off or placing some of your employees on short-time working and require further information, or to discuss the issues raised by this article, please contact Herrington Carmichael’s Employment Department on 0118 977 4045 or employment@herrington-carmichael.com
This reflects the law at the date of publication and is written as a general guide. It does not contain definitive legal advice, which should be sought as appropriate in relation to a particular matter.
Latest Articles & Legal Insights
Shared Parental Leave Sex Discrimination Claim
Can a man on Shared Parental Leave use a woman on Adoption Leave as a comparator in a sex discrimination claim?
Landmark Decision for Asda Workers
In a landmark Supreme Court decision, retail employees of Asda are now one step closer to succeeding in their claim for equal pay.
UK’s child citizenship fee appeal upheld
The Home Office fee of £1,012 for British child citizenship is declared as unlawful by the Court of Appeal.
National Minimum Wage and ‘Sleep-in’ Shifts
The Supreme Court has ruled that ‘sleep-in shift time’ is not considered ‘work’ for the purposes of the national minimum wage.
Balancing conflicting views in the workplace
If an employee is in a job which requires them to apply a non-biased approach, they should not allow personal faith to interfere.
Fair dismissal after refusal to wear a face mask
In the first case of its kind, an Employment Tribunal has ruled that it was fair to dismiss an employee for refusing to wear a face mask at work.
Sign up
Enter your email address for legal updates on Private Client & Family Law.
Top read insights in 2019
Contract Law
Material Breach of Contract
What is a ‘material’ breach of contract by a party to a commercial contract? This is a critical issue regularly considered by the courts. What constitutes a material breach and what are the remedies?
Property Law
Purchasing Land – Option Agreements
A developer and a landowner can enter into an Option Agreement. What are the strategies that can be employed by both landowners and developers to assist in such land deals?
Divorce and Family Law
What are the Tax Implications of a Civil Partnership?
Is there a significant tax saving to be made by a couple who are married or in a civil partnership that cohabitating couples simply don’t qualify for?
Land & Property Dispute
Restrictive Covenants – The Price of Modification
Having identified that your land is burdened by a restrictive covenant and for the purposes of this article the covenant in question will be that only one residential building can be erected on the land. What do you do next?
Award winning legal advice
We are solicitors in Camberley, Wokingham and London. In 2019, Herrington Carmichael won ‘Property Law Firm of the Year’ at the Thames Valley Business Magazines Property Awards, ‘Best Medium Sized Business’ at the Surrey Heath Business Awards and we were named IR Global’s ‘Member of the Year’. We are ranked as a Leading Firm 2020 by Legal 500 and Alistair McArthur is ranked in Chambers 2020.









London
60 St Martins Lane, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4JS
Camberley
Building 2 Watchmoor Park, Riverside Way, Camberley, Surrey GU15 3YL
Wokingham (Appointment only)
4 The Courtyard, Denmark Street, Wokingham, Berkshire RG40 2AZ
info@herrington-carmichael.com
© 2020 Herrington Carmichael LLP. Registered in England and Wales company number OC322293.
Herrington Carmichael LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
Privacy | Legal Notices, T&Cs, Complaints Resolution | Cookies | Client Feedback