Is using the F-Bomb at work still offensive?

Feb 17, 2023

Using the F-Word at Work is Now Commonplace.

Ms Hasmita Dadhania was employed by SAP (UK) Limited (SAP) as a Service Account Manager. On 20 April 2020, Dadhania attended a meeting with her supervisor Mr Pell. Dadhania claimed that during the meeting Mr Pell said, amongst other things, “I don’t give a f**k”. This was denied by both Mr Pell and another employee present at the meeting.

Following a series of other events, Dadhania resigned on 21 July 2020. Following her termination, Dadhania brought the following claims:

• Constructive Unfair Dismissal
• Discrimination on the basis of her age, race and sex
• Harassment on the basis of her age, race and sex
• Victimisation

Dropping the F-bomb

The Employment Tribunal unanimously found that Dadhania had been unfairly dismissed but had not been subject to discrimination, harassment or victimisation.

An interesting part of the judgment was that the Tribunal said that the use of the words “I don’t give a f**k” are now commonplace in a work setting and do not carry the shock value they once did. The Tribunal found that the reason the Respondent found it difficult to recall the phrase was because of its lack of significance at the time. Importantly, the Tribunal accepted that the comment was not intended to be offensive towards Dadhania.

Dadhania will be awarded compensation for unfair dismissal at a later date.

Common but not always acceptable

Whilst this is evidence that the Tribunal is attempting to reflect what it believes modern workplaces can be like and taking account of what appears to be societal norms, it is important that this is not taken as an endorsement of this behaviour and that employers have standards that are communicated to employees relating to acceptable behaviours and conduct.

In the circumstances of this case, Dadhania heard what she considered to be foul language in an aggressive context targeted at her, whereas the Tribunal disagreed and considered it was said generally and not directed at her. It is in these general circumstances that the Tribunal found the language can be commonplace and no longer shocking. There would have likely been a different outcome if the explicit language had been directed toward her, and it is important to note that expletives in general may still be considered out of place in certain work environments.

It is also still likely that wording used in a hurtful context will be considered unacceptable and may amount to discrimination and harassment.

For further information on discrimination and unfair dismissal or to discuss the issues raised by this case law update, please contact our Employment Group on 01276 854663 or

This reflects the law and market position at the date of publication and is written as a general guide. It does not contain definitive legal advice, which should be sought in relation to a specific matter.

Darren Smith

Darren Smith

Latest News & Insights

All in a Day’s Work: Employment Podcast Series

Our Employment team bring you a monthly podcast covering all aspects of Employment law for businesses and individuals. You can browse our podcasts below…

Top Legal Insights


Contract Law

Material Breach of Contract

What is a ‘material’ breach of contract by a party to a commercial contract? This is a critical issue regularly considered by the courts. What constitutes a material breach and what are the remedies?

Property Law

Commercial Lease: The Financial impact on Landlord and Tenant

Coronavirus (COVID-19) and the restrictions now in place to control its spread, are having a significant effect on many business sectors.

Divorce and Family Law

Divorce in Lockdown: Can I get some discreet legal advice?

We have spoken to clients who are unfortunately experiencing some family issues, and would like to obtain expert legal advice, yet don’t know how...

Land & Property Dispute

Restrictive Covenants – The Price of Modification

Having identified that your land is burdened by a restrictive covenant and for the purposes of this article the covenant in question will be that only one residential building can be erected on the land. What do you do next?

Wills, Trusts and Probate

Why is having a will so important?

It is entirely up to you if and when you want to create a Will, but it is important to be aware of the consequences of not having a Will.

Award winning legal advice

Herrington Carmichael offers legal advice to UK and International businesses as well as individuals and families. Rated as a ‘Leading Firm 2024’ by the legal directory Legal 500 and listed in The Times ‘Best Law Firms 2023 & 2024’. Herrington Carmichael has offices in London, Farnborough, Reading, and Ascot.

+44 (0)1276 686 222


Brennan House, Farnborough Aerospace Centre Business Park, Farnborough, GU14 6XR

Reading (Appointment only)
The Abbey, Abbey Gardens, Abbey Street, Reading RG1 3BA

Ascot (Appointment only)
102, Berkshire House, 39-51 High Street, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7HY

London (Appointment only)
60 St Martins Lane, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4JS

Privacy Policy   |   Legal Notices, T&Cs, Complaints Resolution   |   Cookies  |   Client Feedback   |  Diversity Data



Our Services

Corporate Lawyers
Commercial Lawyers
Commercial Property Lawyers
Conveyancing Solicitors
Dispute Resolution Lawyers
Divorce & Family Lawyers
Employment Lawyers
Immigration Law Services
Private Wealth & Inheritance Lawyers
Startups & New Business Lawyers

Pay Online >

Please be aware that we have no plans to change our bank details. If you receive any indication that any of our bank details have changed please contact us before sending us any funds. We take no responsibility for monies you transfer into the wrong bank account.

© 2024 Herrington Carmichael LLP. Registered in England and Wales company number OC322293.

Herrington Carmichael LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 446245.