Directors’ Duties – The Creditor Duty
The creditor duty refers to the duty of directors to consider and give appropriate weighting to the interests of creditors during the event that the company is approaching insolvency, or when the directors ought to know that the company is insolvent, bordering on insolvency or when an insolvent administration or liquidation is probable. The court has recognised that the creditor duty is not a standalone duty and is not a duty that directors owe directly to creditors. Instead, the duty derives from directors’ duties to the company.
In October 2022 in the case of BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and others [2022] UKSC 25, the Supreme Court delivered its long-awaited decision in relation to the trigger point at which directors must have regard to the interests of the creditors of company, pursuant to s172(3) of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006).
Background of the case:
Sequana SA was the sole shareholder AWA (a subsidiary of Sequana SA). In May 2009, the directors of AWA authorised the distribution of a dividend of €135 million to its sole shareholder. This extinguished almost the whole of a larger debt due from Sequana SA, owed to AWA. At the time the dividend was paid, AWA was solvent however, it had long-term pollution-related liabilities of an uncertain amount and there was a ‘real risk’ that AWA might become insolvent in the future. AWA subsequently went into insolvent administration almost ten years later, in October 2018. BTI, a creditor of AWA, sought to recover the amount of the May dividend from AWA’s directors. It argued that the directors’ decision to distribute the May dividend was taken in breach of the directors’ creditor duty because the directors had not considered or acted in the interests of AWA’s creditors. The previous judgement of the Court of Appeal ([2019] EWCA Civ 112) held that the creditors’ interests duty may be triggered where actual insolvency had not yet occurred but should be triggered when the “directors know or should know that the company is or is likely to become insolvent”.
On appeal, the Supreme Court confirmed that the creditors’ interests duty arises when the directors know or ought to know the company is insolvent or bordering on insolvency, or insolvency is probable. The content of the creditors’ interests duty is to give consideration and weight to creditor interests in a manner that is appropriate to the circumstances of the company at the time. This duty must be balanced against other stakeholders, including members. However, once insolvency is inevitable, creditors’ interests are paramount
It was held that the nature of the creditor duty and the extent to which it overrides any conflicting interest of shareholders will depend on the extent of the company’s financial difficulties. It was proposed that the greater the company’s financial difficulties are, the more priority should be given to creditor interests. Where an administration or insolvent liquidation is inevitable, the creditors’ interests become paramount as the shareholders cease to retain any valuable interest in the company. This reaffirms the duty under the Companies Act 2006 (which contemplates that a director may in certain circumstances, have to act in the interests of creditors) and by commercial logic.
So, even though the insolvent administration did not take place until 10 years later, at the time of the distribution in 2009, the directors should have been able to predict that there was a strong possibility that the company would not be able to settle debts in relation to its long term pollution related liabilities, and not declared the may 2009 dividend.
If you require advice on the creditor duty, please contact Michelle.Lamberth@Herrington-Carmichael.com from our Corporate & Commercial Team.
This reflects the law and market position at the date of publication and is written as a general guide. It does not contain definitive legal advice, which should be sought in relation to a specific matter.

Anisha Malik
Paralegal, Corporate and Commercial

Michelle Lamberth
Senior Paralegal, Corporate and Commercial Law
t: 0118 989 9706
e: michelle.lamberth@herrington-carmichael.com
Latest News & Insights
Menopause and Fire & Rehire Practices
Government Announcements: Menopause in the Workplace and Fire and Rehire Practices ...
Marital Discrimination
Welcome clarity given on claims for discrimination on the grounds of marital status Marriage and...
Can I monitor my employees and workers?
The data protection laws in the UK are currently governed by the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA...
All in a Day’s Work: Employment Podcast Series
Our Employment team bring you a monthly podcast covering all aspects of Employment law for businesses and individuals. You can browse our podcasts below…
All in a Day’s Work: Discretionary Benefits
The episode will focus on what discretionary benefits employers can offer and how those benefits can sometime become contractual entitlements.
All in a Day’s Work: Has the HR Grinch stolen Christmas?
We will be looking at why Christmas can be such a difficult period for employers and why Christmas parties in particular can be so tricky
All in a Day’s Work: Sponsor Licences
This month’s episode will be an overview of sponsor licences and the process of obtaining a sponsor licence for businesses.
Top Legal Insights
Contract Law
Material Breach of Contract
What is a ‘material’ breach of contract by a party to a commercial contract? This is a critical issue regularly considered by the courts. What constitutes a material breach and what are the remedies?
Property Law
Commercial Lease: The Financial impact on Landlord and Tenant
Coronavirus (COVID-19) and the restrictions now in place to control its spread, are having a significant effect on many business sectors.
Divorce and Family Law
Divorce in Lockdown: Can I get some discreet legal advice?
We have spoken to clients who are unfortunately experiencing some family issues, and would like to obtain expert legal advice, yet don’t know how...
Land & Property Dispute
Restrictive Covenants – The Price of Modification
Having identified that your land is burdened by a restrictive covenant and for the purposes of this article the covenant in question will be that only one residential building can be erected on the land. What do you do next?
Award winning legal advice
We are solicitors in Camberley, Wokingham and London. In 2019, Herrington Carmichael won ‘Property Law Firm of the Year’ at the Thames Valley Business Magazines Property Awards, ‘Best Medium Sized Business’ at the Surrey Heath Business Awards and we were named IR Global’s ‘Member of the Year’. We are ranked as a Leading Firm 2023 by Legal 500 and Alistair McArthur is ranked in Chambers 2022.










Camberley
Building 2 Watchmoor Park, Riverside Way, Camberley, Surrey GU15 3YL
+44 (0)1276 686 222
Reading (Appointment only)
The Abbey, Abbey Gardens, Abbey Street, Reading RG1 3BA
+44 (0)1276 686 222
Ascot (Appointment only)
102, Berkshire House, 39-51 High Street, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7HY
+44 (0)1344 623388
London (Appointment only)
60 St Martins Lane, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4JS
+44 (0)203 326 0317
Wokingham (Appointment only)
The Workstation Wokingham, Markham House, 20 Broad Street, Wokingham, RG40 1AH
Our Services
Corporate Lawyers
Commercial Lawyers
Commercial Property Lawyers
Conveyancing Solicitors
Dispute Resolution Lawyers
Divorce & Family Lawyers
Employment Lawyers
Immigration Law Services
Private Wealth & Inheritance Lawyers
Startups & New Business Lawyers
© 2022 Herrington Carmichael LLP. Registered in England and Wales company number OC322293.
Herrington Carmichael is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 446245.
Privacy Policy | Legal Notices, T&Cs, Complaints Resolution | Cookies
Client Feedback | Diversity Data