Employment Law Update – February 2020

Feb 10, 2020

We are pleased to provide you with the Herrington Carmichael employment law update for February 2020.

This is a key note summary of some of the main developments in employment law in the last month.

1. Bereavement Leave

The Government has published new draft legislation to provide a statutory minimum level of paid leave for parents who suffer the loss of a child.  This is proposed to be in force from 6th April 2020. 

The legislation will create a right to two weeks’ leave if a working parent loses a child under the age of 18, or suffers a still birth after 24 weeks of pregnancy.  Leave can be taken either in a block of two weeks, or in two separate blocks of one week.  Workers who have been employed for a continuous period of at least 26 weeks at the statutory rate of £148.68 per week, or 90% of average weekly earnings, where this is lower.  Workers who have not been employed for a continuous period of at least 26 weeks will still be entitled to two weeks’ unpaid leave.

Whilst many employers do already provide bereavement leave for far wider circumstances, it is not necessarily standard practice.  These changes will provide some, albeit limited, protection for all workers.  It is recommended that employers review their existing policies in light of the change here.  

2. Off payroll rules going ahead

The Government has launched a review into the upcoming off payroll rules which are set to come into force from 6th April 2020.  The Financial Secretary to the Treasury, Jesse Norman, however, has stated that: ‘the purpose of this consultation is to make sure that the implementation of these changes in April is as smooth as possible’.  This should end all speculation of a possible government U-turn on the off-payroll rules.

Under the new legislation, the private sector will be brought in line with the public sector in relation to the IR35 tax regime, which will imply new requirements on to fee-payers in a consultancy arrangement. The new legislation will shift the burden of determining an individual’s employment status from the individual, to the end user.

For the best possible chance of avoiding liability, companies should now be considering how their business is structured and how they currently engage with contractors or consultants.  

3. Disability Discrimination – Tesco Stores Limited v Tennant

The Employment Appeals Tribunal has held that when bringing a disability discrimination claim, a Claimant must show that their condition had a ‘long-term effect’ at the time of the alleged act of discrimination.  In Tesco Stores Limited v Tennant, the Claimant brought proceedings for disability discrimination and harassment based on actions she alleged her employer took from September 2016.  The Employment Tribunal found that the Claimant was disabled at the relevant time of the alleged acts of discrimination, finding specifically, that from 6th September 2016, she suffered an impairment which had a substantial adverse effect on her ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities and was ‘long-term’ under the Equality Act, because by September 2017, it had lasted 12 months. 

Tesco appealed on the basis that in order to claim disability discrimination, the Claimant must be disabled at the time of the alleged act.  As the required effect of the impairment would have had to have lasted 12 months before she could be considered disabled, the EAT held that the Claimant was only disabled and could therefore only bring claims as from 6th September 2017. 

It is important to note that the definition of ‘long-term’ under the Equality Act may also be satisfied as being likely to last at least 12 months.  Had the Claimant’s condition been considered likely to last at least 12 months in September 2016, her claim may have been successful.  However she did not have such a prognosis at the relevant time.

When bringing or defending a discrimination claim, it is important to carefully consider whether the impairment meets the definition of disabled under the Equality Act.  This case has confirmed that when relying on an impairment having lasted for at least 12 months, this must be the position at the time of the alleged acts of discrimination or there must be a clear indication that the condition will likely last for at least 12 months. 

4. Samira Ahmed equal pay claim

The BBC presenter, Samira Ahmed, has been successful in bringing an equal pay claim against the BBC. The claim was on the grounds that she was paid £440 per episode of Newswatch, while the male presenter, Jeremy Vine, was paid £3,000 per episode of Points of View.

The Employment Tribunal found that Samira’s work was “like work”, or work of equal value to Jeremy’s and rejected the BBC’s argument that the presenters’ roles were not comparable.  Further, the Employment Tribunal stated that “the BBC found itself in difficulties in this case because it did not (and, to an extent, still does not) have a transparent and consistent process for evaluating and determining pay for its on-air talent.”

Whilst this judgement does not change the application of the law which has seen a number of high profile equal pay claims of late, it will likely increase the awareness of these types of claim further.  This case underlines the importance of employers to have adequate and objective processes in place to determine pay rates. 

For further information, or to discuss the issues raised by this update, please contact Herrington Carmichael’s Employment Department on 0118 977 4045 or employment@herrington-carmichael.com

This reflects the law at the date of publication and is written as a general guide. It does not contain definitive legal advice, which should be sought as appropriate in relation to a particular matter.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sign up

Enter your email address for legal updates on Private Client & Family Law.

Please see our privacy policy regarding use of your data.


Contact us

Support for you, your family and your business. Get in touch today by phone or enquire online. 

Tel: +44 (0) 1276 686 222

Top read insights in 2019

Contract Law

Material Breach of Contract

What is a ‘material’ breach of contract by a party to a commercial contract? This is a critical issue regularly considered by the courts. What constitutes a material breach and what are the remedies?

Property Law

Purchasing Land - Option Agreements

A developer and a landowner can enter into an Option Agreement. What are the strategies that can be employed by both landowners and developers to assist in such land deals?

Divorce and Family Law

What are the Tax Implications of a Civil Partnership?

Is there a significant tax saving to be made by a couple who are married or in a civil partnership that cohabitating couples simply don’t qualify for?  

Land & Property Dispute

Restrictive Covenants – The Price of Modification

Having identified that your land is burdened by a restrictive covenant and for the purposes of this article the covenant in question will be that only one residential building can be erected on the land. What do you do next?

Wills, Trusts and Probate

Is my Will applicable to my Spanish property?

You must be careful when relying on an English Will in relation to your Spanish property.

Awards | Accreditations 

Accredited Conveyancing Lawyers
Accredited Immigration & Asylum Lawyers
Accredited Conveyancing Lawyers
Accredited Immigration & Asylum Lawyers
London

60 St Martins Lane, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4JS 

+44 (0) 203 755 0557

Camberley

Building 9, Riverside Way, Watchmoor Park, Camberley, Surrey. GU15 3YL. 

+44 (0)1276 686 222

Wokingham

27 Broad Street, Wokingham, Berkshire. RG40 1AU.

+44 (0)118 977 4045

info@herrington-carmichael.com

© 2019 Herrington Carmichael LLP. Registered in England and Wales company number OC322293.

Herrington Carmichael LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

Privacy   |   Terms and Conditions   |   Cookies   |   Client Feedback