Is a dismissal for refusing to attend work for COVID reasons automatically unfair?

Apr 28, 2021

In the recent case of Rodgers v Leeds Laser Cutting Ltd, the Claimant did not have the required two years’ service to bring an ordinary unfair dismissal claim but was able to bring an ‘automatically’ unfair dismissal claim on the grounds that the principle reason that his employment was terminated was his reasonable belief in there being a serious and imminent danger in his workplace.

The Claimant had told his employer that he had “no alternative but to stay off work until the lockdown has eased” due to concerns that he might infect his vulnerable children with COVID-19. The Claimant was later dismissed as a result of his refusal to go into work.

The Tribunal accepted that the Claimant’s workplace was large, with only a handful of people working within it at the time. This made it possible for employees to maintain social distancing.

The Tribunal accepted that the Claimant considered there to be circumstances of serious and imminent danger “all around”, however, it did not find that the Claimant believed there were such circumstances specifically within the workplace. The Claimant had not raised any concerns in relation to social distancing or other safety measures at his workplace. As a result, the Tribunal concluded that the Claimant’s decision to stay off work was not directly linked to his working conditions.

The Tribunal also found that any belief that there were circumstances of serious and imminent danger were not objectively reasonable in this case on the basis that it was possible for all employees at the Claimant’s workplace to follow social distancing and the Respondent had followed the government workplace guidance available at the time.

What is notable in this judgment is that whilst the Tribunal did not find circumstances of serious and imminent danger on these facts, it did not rule out that conditions pertaining to COVID-19 could amount to such in different circumstances.

Although this judgment is not binding on future Employment Tribunal decisions, it is important to note that COVID-19 could well amount to ‘circumstances of serious and imminent danger’. This case should be seen as a reminder of the potential for automatic unfair dismissal claims if an employee refuses to work due to a perceived risk of serious and imminent danger and is subsequently dismissed as a result, and the need to take advice. That said, employers who have followed the government’s COVID-Secure workplace guidance and implemented protective measures may take some comfort from this case as the decision suggests that such measures could mitigate the risk of COVID-19 posing a serious and imminent danger.

For further information, or to discuss the issues raised by this update, please contact our Employment Group on 0118 977 4045 or


This reflects the law at the date of publication and is written as a general guide. It does not contain definitive legal advice, which should be sought as appropriate in relation to a particular matter.

Tom Hyatt

Tom Hyatt

Trainee Solicitor, Employment Law

Solicitor, Employment Law

t: 0118 989 8153

Sign up

Enter your email address for legal updates on Employment & Immigration Law.

Please see our privacy policy regarding use of your data.

Latest Insights - sign up to our Emailers

Our Emailers will bring you the latest news and insights from our legal teams as we look at the key talking points in life and in law.

Our insights will include articles, podcast discussion and information about our events and services.

You can sign up to as many as you wish and you can opt out at any time.

Sign up to our Emailers

Please see our privacy policy regarding use of your data.

Latest News & Insights

Top Legal Insights


Contract Law

Material Breach of Contract

What is a ‘material’ breach of contract by a party to a commercial contract? This is a critical issue regularly considered by the courts. What constitutes a material breach and what are the remedies?

Property Law

Commercial Lease: The Financial impact on Landlord and Tenant

Coronavirus (COVID-19) and the restrictions now in place to control its spread, are having a significant effect on many business sectors.

Divorce and Family Law

Divorce in Lockdown: Can I get some discreet legal advice?

We have spoken to clients who are unfortunately experiencing some family issues, and would like to obtain expert legal advice, yet don’t know how...

Land & Property Dispute

Restrictive Covenants – The Price of Modification

Having identified that your land is burdened by a restrictive covenant and for the purposes of this article the covenant in question will be that only one residential building can be erected on the land. What do you do next?

Wills, Trusts and Probate

Why is having a will so important?

It is entirely up to you if and when you want to create a Will, but it is important to be aware of the consequences of not having a Will.

Award winning legal advice

Herrington Carmichael offers legal advice to UK and International businesses as well as individuals and families. Rated as a ‘Leading Firm 2023’ by the legal directory Legal 500 and listed in The Times ‘Best Law Firms 2023’. Herrington Carmichael has offices in London, Farnborough, Reading, and Ascot.


60 St Martins Lane, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4JS 

+44 (0) 203 755 0557



Building 2  Watchmoor Park, Riverside Way, Camberley, Surrey  GU15 3YL

+44 (0)1276 686 222


Wokingham (Appointment only)

4 The Courtyard, Denmark Street, Wokingham, Berkshire RG40 2AZ

+44 (0)118 977 4045

© 2020 Herrington Carmichael LLP. Registered in England and Wales company number OC322293.

Herrington Carmichael LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

Privacy   |   Legal Notices, T&Cs, Complaints Resolution   |   Cookies   |   Client Feedback