Redundancy

Strategic, compliant support through workforce change and redundancy.

Redundancy is a legally defined form of dismissal that must be handled carefully to avoid unfair dismissal, discrimination and protective award claims. Employers must establish a genuine redundancy situation and follow a fair and transparent process, including consultation, fair selection and consideration of alternative employment. Redundancy processes are under increasing scrutiny following recent case law and reforms introduced by the Employment Rights Act 2025. We advise employers at all stages of workforce restructuring, helping to manage legal risk while maintaining employee relations and operational continuity.

This service supports employers of all sizes undertaking restructures, downsizing or organisational change.

We advise on whether a redundancy situation exists under the statutory definition, including business closure, workplace closure or reduced requirements for work of a particular kind. We support employers in documenting the commercial rationale and considering alternatives to redundancy.

 

We advise on fair consultation processes, selection pools and objective criteria. Where collective redundancy thresholds are met, we guide employers through representative elections and statutory consultation requirements. We also advise on suitable alternative employment and trial periods.

 

We support employers with redundancy documentation, including consultation letters, scripts and decision records. We also advise on governance frameworks and provide training for managers on conducting redundancy processes consistently and lawfully.

 

Where disputes arise, we advise on settlement strategies and defend Employment Tribunal claims, including unfair dismissal, discrimination and protective award claims.

Key contact

Alex-Harper-PNG
Alex Harper
Senior Solicitor, Employment

Insights

Get valuable insights from our articles.

Mentor, reading and men with laptop, office and help with article on website, creative or journalism. Intern, learning and people with tech for story, teamwork and editing with manager in newsroom

Your Employees Know You’re Monitoring Them. But Do They Know How?

Employee monitoring is nothing new. However, the increasing use of productivity tracking software, AI-driven analytics, location monitoring and other workplace…
the acronym acas for advisory, conciliation and arbitration service word or concept represented by wooden letter tiles on a wooden table with glasses and a book

Big Changes Coming to ACAS Code

ACAS has launched a consultation on a new Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures, marking the first full…
Podcasts_Logo

All in a Day’s Work: Maternity Discrimination Case Law Update – Osborn v Mothercare

In this episode of All in a Day’s Work, Alex Harper is joined by Cassie Blackledge to examine the recent…

Meet our experts

Dedicated professionals ready to assist you.

Cassie Blackledge PNG
Cassie Blackledge
Solicitor, Employment
Jo Boxhall PNG
Jo Boxhall
Solicitor, Employment
Tom-Hyatt-PNG
Tom Hyatt
Senior Solicitor, Employment
Sam Gray PNG
Samuel Gray
Senior Solicitor, Employment
Alex-Harper-PNG
Alex Harper
Senior Solicitor, Employment
Hannah King PNG
Hannah King
Legal Director, Employment
Matt Jenkin PNG
Matt Jenkin
Partner, Employment
Darren-Smith
Darren Smith
Partner, Employment
Alistair McArthur PNG
Alistair McArthur
Partner, Head of Employment

Frequently Asked Questions

Find answers to your most pressing questions about our services and processes.

Recent appellate guidance and legislative reform have heightened expectations around consultation quality, transparency and decision making in redundancy exercises. Failures in process, even where the underlying business rationale is sound, are increasingly being challenged.

A redundancy situation arises where an employer closes its business, closes a workplace or has a reduced requirement for employees to carry out work of a particular kind. Redundancy is a statutory concept and should not be used to address conduct or capability issues.

The primary risks include unfair dismissal claims, discrimination claims and protective awards for failure to consult collectively. Compensation exposure can be significant, particularly where group claims are brought, and mishandling redundancies can also damage morale and reputation.

Yes. Consultation must be meaningful and take place before decisions are finalised. Employers must explain proposals, listen to feedback and consider alternatives. Failure to do so is a common basis for successful claims.

Collective consultation is required where 20 or more redundancies are proposed within a 90 day period at a single establishment. This triggers obligations to consult employee representatives and comply with statutory minimum consultation periods.

Selection pools should include employees doing the same or interchangeable work. Selection criteria must be objective, measurable and consistently applied. Care is needed to avoid criteria that could be directly or indirectly discriminatory.

Yes. Employers must actively consider whether suitable alternative employment exists anywhere within the organisation throughout the redundancy process. A failure to do so is a common feature of successful unfair dismissal claims.

Yes. If redundancy selection or criteria disadvantage employees with protected characteristics, employers may face discrimination claims in addition to unfair dismissal claims. Discrimination compensation is uncapped.

Confirm the business rationale, explore alternatives to redundancy and plan consultation carefully. Taking early legal advice can significantly reduce risk and help structure a fair and defensible process.

Still have questions?

We’re here to help you.